
E-MAIL THE AUTHOR |
ARCHIVES
YOU'LL NEVER WRITE A BOOK IN THIS TOWN AGAIN
October 5, 2005
By D.K. Holm
Lays of the Land
When I was much younger and confirmation of Rock Hudson's homosexuality began to seep into the mainstream without the cover of leering hints or coded phrasing, I began to ask myself the question, "Well, so what?"
"Why can't a gay guy become a world-famous actor? Isn't the essence of acting playing someone? Why are we so hung up on the private lives of stars, or at least on their variance from their screen personas? And in any case, there are more fag hags than regular women in the world as far as I can tell, so that should ensure an openly gay star's mega-status."
 |
Such questions arose again while breezing through the gossipy THE MAN WHO INVENTED ROCK HUDSON (THE PRETTY BOYS AND DIRTY DEALS OF HENRY WILLSON (Carrol and Graf, 480 pages, $26, ISBN 0 7867 1607 X), by Robert Hofler, a theater reporter for VARIETY. Mr. Hofler archives the history not only of Hudson but of the multitude of street trash and rough trade that talent agent Willson turned into mono-monikered movie stars with the sort of jut-jawed mien that only a decade earlier was the inevitable source of humor in screwball comedies and Three Stooges shorts. It was as if Willson made the Tom of Finland aesthetic a national rage. There is little doubt: Willson changed the way America apprehended male beauty.
Willson was the scion of a theatrical entrepreneur who stayed on the east coast and privately financed his son's career while Henry moved to the west coast where after a career as a show biz trade journal columnist specializing in the "youth market," he became a much-tormented acolyte of David Selznick's before moving on to other high profile agencies and then on his own. He was a shabby guy who was a personal friend of fellow sleaze Roy Cohn and whose client list was almost exclusively gay (I'm guessing that only living remnants of that list prevent Mr. Hofler from enjoying full disclosure). He was an alcoholic who insisted that his clients give him a test drive in the sack before he manufactured new names, table manners, and fake girlfriends for them. In his dotage, when he yo-yoed between his office and the gay bar down the street to cadge drinks, he would announce "there are more homosexuals in the Polo Lounge then there are in this bar.[page 409]" A right wing patriot, he claimed that the model for Uncle Sam was a relative.
Perhaps the biggest revelation of the book is how complicit Hudson was in the creation of his career. According to Mr. Hofler, young Roy Scherer of the Midwest gave himself over wholly to Willson, who was responsible for his name and manners and various publicity stunts that exerted enough force to free Hudson from the back lot at Universal. It also helped that a married executive at Universal, Edward Muhl, was in love with him and saw to it that Hudson got placed in key 1950s soap operas. But the point is that even as a kid Hudson wanted to be a movie star and was proactive in getting into the pictures despite low-lever trucker jobs. He may have been attracted to the movies for the very reason that he could give vent to his promiscuous sexual appetite.
 |
Willson's client list was surprisingly long and did include actresses. But his focus was on beefcake (a termed invented by hack Sidney Skolsky) and his charges, many yclept by their guru, included Guy Madison, Calhoun, Sal Mineo, Robert Wagner, John Saxon, Mike Conners, Clint Walker, Robert Fuller, John Smith, Tab Hunter, Troy Donahue, Cal Bolder, Van Williams, John Gavin, and Chad Everett. Willson had a profitable relationship with an exec at Warner who would place Willson's latest talent into many of the TV western series the studio churned out. He would often lose clients because simple association with Willson was enough to spread rumors, at least by the late 1950s.
Mr. Hofler is also good at portraying a sort of James Ellroy-esque vision of Hollywood, with its secret deals, hidden lives, and tendency to betrayal. The author goes into rich detail about Willson's satanic pact with CONFIDENTIAL magazine (though Mr. Hofler refutes the legend that Willson "gave up" George Nadar to the scandal sheet to save meal-ticket Hudson from exposure. Instead, it was ex-con Rory Calhoun and some useful stooge to be named later). Willson was a physically ugly character who used rich debutants as beards, had a germ phobia (his house reeked of Lysol), and like his pal Cohn preferred "real men" to fairies, worried, Mr. Hofler theorizes, that their effeminacy would "expose" him. He advised his clients never to live with another man, remembering the embarrassing hubbub that Cary Grant's gay marriage to Randolph Scott caused back in the 1930s (though Mr. Hofler doesn't go into the whole Hudson-Jim Nabors marriage thing, which apparently began as a fake wedding invite prank by some Beverly Hills gays by in the mid-1960s). He employed Ellroy-style moonlighting cops to muscle blackmailers into silence.
Mr. Hofler writes the book in a very entertaining style that lovingly celebrates the slangy, word clotted style of Walter Winchell, Westbrook Pegler, and other icons of mid-century columizers (a guy playing Tarzan is "working the vines"). The rich vocabulary will drive you to the dictionary. Here is just a partial list of the exotic terms with which Mr. Hofler seduces the reader: "telamon" (page 118), "formicary" (page 128), "auriferous" (page 175), "lambent" (page 205), "nidification" (page 232), "funambulism" (page 248), "epigonies" (page 254), "carapace" (page 385), and "rutilant" (page 412), to mention only a few.
There wasn't quite as much gossip in the book as I assumed there would be but what's there is "cherce" (to quote PAT AND MIKE):
- Joshua Logan was a size queen and Willson provided "several well-endowed clients in Logan's sailor comedy ENSIGN PULVER. [page 401]"
- Cesar Romero was gay and Willson admired him for the tastefulness of his arranged marriage to Sapphic beard Alexis Smith.
- One former Hudson twist blackmailed Willson into getting him an acting career in movies (this person goes unnamed and so is presumably still alive).
- Mr. Hofler "outs" four other agents who according to him passed around young hunks to each other (page 213).
- In revenge for Tab Hunter leaving his client list, Willson saw to it that the actor's "pajama party" scandal was resurrected from his past.
- Mr. Hofler gives perhaps the most complete account of Hudson's marriage to Phyllis Gates, who happened to be Willson's secretary at the time and, according to Mr. Hofler, at other points in her life ran with a Sapphic crowd.
- James Dean pal Vampira (Maila Nurmi) claimed that Willson took out a mob hit on her.
- Troy Donahue had a (hetero)-sexual appetite that matched Hudson's.
- Alain Delon just barely escaped Willson's titular clutches.
Wilson ended his life destitute in a show biz retirement home where the likes of Robert Wagner were startled to run across his crypt-defying visage. He died in 1978 of liver damage. Few noticed his passing, despite the vast, perhaps dire influence he had on the culture (by the way, Mr. Hofler lists Hudson's death day as August 5, 1987 at least in the advance reader but the IMDB has it as October 2 1985). And it may be that Willson was right: Hollywood obviously thinks that America (at least as the culture exists now) is not ready for openly gay movie stars who can be accepted by female fans and male audiences alike, at least if the ostentatious antics of aggressively "heterosexual" stars about whom Hudson style gossip circulates are any evidence.
At the opposite end of the Kinseyian sexual scale is the raft of roués who, like Hudson, get into the biz to have access to like-minded women or not. Hollywood is still a Rat Pack world, at least on the street and casting couch level, and according to my spies down there, it's getting harder and harder to get laid if you are just an average Casanova. The aspiring starlets are more mercenary then ever, if that's possible, and even less willing to put out for anyone less than a superplayer who can advance their career. Size, I guess, really doesn't matter anymore, unless we are talking about a wallet.
 |
If you are a red-blooded American who also happens to read, and if by chance you pick up a copy of Shawn Levy's new book, THE LAST PLAYBOY: THE HIGH LIFE OF PORFIRIO RUBIROSA (4th Estate, 356 pages, $24.95, ISBN 0 00 717059 9), you will most likely consult the contents page or search the index for the part of the book that is going to discuss the book subject's biggest part. Specifically, you will be reading pages 124 through 128, where Mr. Levy writes a mini essay, called "genital endowment" in the index, an engorged digression on the most famous thing about a guy who was one of the first people famous for being famous.
Rubirosa, the son of a Dominican soldier turned diplomat, a serial marrier of progressively more wealthy or famous women, polo player, and race car driver, and, according to some of Mr. Levy's revelations, an agent of his government involved in some way in the elimination of the repressive regime's exiled enemies, is above all, the man famous for his humongous penis. So thick, so long, so aggressive was this member that its reputation preceded it, just as the penis itself preceded Rubirosa by about a foot. So notorious was this penis that a common restaurant pepper mill was unoffically renamed a "rubirosa."
There have been big dicks before. Milton Berle, Forest Tucker, and numerous others whom SPY used to gather together for one of its occasional and notorious penis-oriented "SPY Lists," and have all been the subject of rumors concerning their robust sexual organs. Porn star John Holmes was well-endowed, as was made evident in the several hundred straight and gay porno movies he made. With Holmes we can see, so to speak, what all the excitement, on both sides of the screen, was all about. But Rubirosa's member can only be the subject of conjecture, or rapturous encomia by some of his ex-wives. There is no picture of The Prick in Mr. Levy's book, though there are numerous snaps of the prick who owned it. The lack of visual confirmation of the legend's legend is the gaping hole, the great lack, the elephant in the room at the heart of Mr. Levy's book. Fortunately, the very subject of the biography and his glamorous life, and Mr. Levy's prose style and dogged reporting, more than make up for this metaphoric dismemberment.
 |
Rubirosa never made a movie. He wasn't a war hero, or a world leader. He won a few races, sure, but what he is famous for is serial hypergamy, the wedding and bedding of a succession of rich dames, starting with Danielle Darrieux, and proceeding through Doris Duke, Barbara Hutton, and Zsa Zsa Gabor, before ending up with the aspiring New Wave actress Odile Rodin, who became his widow on July 5, 1965. He was also married briefly to the daughter of the Dominican Republic's dictator, Trujillo. Gabor's previous husband, George Sanders, was one of the few men to catch sight of the meaty monolith. He happened to observe it plunging in and out of his wife when he walked into the bedroom unannounced with a team of divorce photographers, finding Rubirosa and Co. on top of Zsa Zsa.
You might well ask, does such a subject really require a whole book? Wouldn't a mere magazine article suffice, such as the one that ran in VANITY FAIR some time back? If you think such a thought than you understand neither publishing nor human nature. It is of vital importance to your average American male to dwell, if only momentarily, in the ragged terrain of sexual comparisons. If you have never measured your own cock, and then tried to cheat by putting the butt end of the ruler against the cremaster, then you may indeed have no interest in this book, and more power to you as you blithely wander through life unaware how well you measure up or down. Mr. Willson would use this fascination as evidence of the latent homosexuality of all American males.
Mr. Levy (who is the reviewer for the Portland OREGONIAN, and has written other books including a histories of the Rat Pack and Swinging London and the definitive biography of Jerry Lewis) does a fine and amusing and sometimes even compassionate job, of chronicling Rubirosa's life, and is also prone to taking detours down the path of the lives Rubin intersected, such as Gabor, Hutton, and various politicians and celebrities. With access to Rubirosa's own autobiography (never translated into English) and some Spanish language bios, plus FBI and other government folders, Mr. Levy lifts the veil that shrouded this seemingly open book. If I had a complaint, it would only be that Mr. Levy succumbs to the ubiquitous tendency to write acknowledgements as if they were acceptance speeches, but with no exit music mercifully (for us) to cue you off the stage. His goes on for six pages and refers to everyone from helpful librarians to "bosom buddies." Be that as it may, Mr. Levy has the knack for the cogent turn of phrase. One of my favorites is his reference in passing to another playboy in action, Gunther Sachs, whose marriage to Brigitte Bardot is heralded as a "triumph of the skirt-chaser's craft" (page 307). And Mr. Levy does not stint on the gossip or odd fact, such as when he notes that the combined 20 marriages of the Gabor sisters amounted to but one child.
 |
Mr. Levy sat down (at a keyboard) for in interview with this reporter. Here are the fruits of that colloquy:
The afterward suggests that it took about six months to physically write the book. So how do you do it? For those out there who only fantasize, so far, about writing a book, how the hell do you do it? How do you sit down and write the whole big damn thing? Do you have a schedule? Do you have a daily word count as a goal, or something like that? What fuels the writing engine?
I make a list of everything that needs to go into the book people, characters, incidents, oddities, themes, etc. From that master list, I choose each day what I feel like writing. As much as possible I work in chronology, but since I can edit and move things around, I don't have to do that strictly. And some 1500 words a day seems about sufficient 6 double-spaced pages. If it's going better, great. There were a couple 5000-word days. Those give you some breathing room and make up for the days that you can't whip yourself into action.
What surprised you most about Rubirosa's life once you got into the serious research?
He had a reputation for being a diplomat in name only, but the records I discovered in Santo Domingo and Paris showed that he actually worked at his job and was occasionally given sensitive assignments. He was capable of some important work. And he was taken seriously by presidents and ambassadors everywhere.
Did you ever hear what Rubirosa sounded like? Did you find any newsreel footage of him anywhere?
I have an LP of the highlights of the 1956 Sebring 12-Hour race, with two interviews with Rubirosa on it. His voice was higher-pitched than I imagined, and his accent sounded more Portuguese than Spanish or Italian. I found some newsreels but none with voice recordings.
What is this obsession you have with slick, hustling show biz types like Jerry Lewis and the Rat Pack, and now an international playboy? Do you live in a bachelor pad with a tiger skin throw rug and spend your evenings in smokey nightclubs rubbing elbows with top models and race car drivers?
I have a family of three children, a dog, two birds, a mortgage, etc no swinger I. But I grew up looking backward at this era with a kind of fondness. My parents, I realized years later, were a Rat Pack-ish couple, and the music, books and magazines in the house celebrated that era of show biz. Plus the idea of powerful, glamorous creeps never gets old for me.
Would you say that an overarching theme of the book is that THIS is how the world really works, with its political corruption and chasing after tail to finance your lifestyle? As you write, do you feel as if you are unveiling formerly suppressed truths about success and ambition?
I think the point is more that in our corrupt age we sometimes look back to earlier eras for signs of innocence or purity and in fact those days were just as corrupt and putrid and base as our modern era. Rubi is no different from today's celebs-for-celebrity's-sake, but he seemed grander in an age when media saturation was at a far lower level and when people were more credulous about the things they read and heard. You could get away with more, back then. But Rubi wasn't nearly as venal or corrupt as the Rat Pack; Sinatra was King Heel #1.
OK, so in your research did you manage to get a look at Rubirosa's dick? Did you find a candid photo snapped by Zsa Zsa hidden somewhere? And if there is an extant picture of Rubirosa's behemoth, why didn't you include it in the book? Or surely one of the surviving ex-wives could have helped with a police artist's sketch.
His ex-wives wouldn't talk (two are still alive) but I did turn up some photos of him doing yoga in old-fashioned tiny gym shorts. I pored over those with a magnifying glass and all I can suppose is that he was in a cold room and was well under wraps.
It sounds as if his testicles were as much a problem as his phallus as big as oranges, heavy, painful, requiring specifically designed harnesses.
It is funny, isn't it, that we somehow imagine a huge penis with normal-sized testicles? The testimony of his valet Victor almost makes me feel sorry for Rubi, his tailor, and those who were involved with him. You imagine two wrecking balls in full swing
I don't know if there is a movie movie in R.'s life (as opposed to, say, a TV movie), but if there were, whom do you imagine playing R.? Or Hutton? Or Zsa Zsa? Or George Sanders, for that matter.
Javier Bardem looks just like him. Jennifer Jason Leigh has the calcium-deficient air of Barbara Hutton. Geena Davis has Doris Duke's jawline. Trujillo and Zsa Zsa are tough roles to cast, though. Sanders would be a plum role for any number of British actors, from David Thewlis to Stephen Fry to Rupert Everett.
What is the single most important quality for a biographer: Organizing skills? Research skills? Grit? Determination? Being able to imagine sympathetically the minds of people who to others might loom as monsters? At what point in the process of research and writing do you "make up your mind," so to speak, about your subject(s)?
I don't know that I ever 'make up my mind' entirely or at least I try not to make it up all in one way. Jerry Lewis is a genius of a stripe, as is Frank Sinatra and, say, Mick Jagger, the villain, if there is one of "Ready Steady Go." Rubi ultimately struck me as sad and small I think of his old age more vividly than his prime.
As for what a biographer needs: research and organizational skills, of course, but you have to remember that you're telling a story and it ought to read with the same fluency of a novel. It's ultimately a writing job, not a researching job, though you need lots of data upon which to rest your most fanciful phases.
I'd like to get a scoop here. What is your next project? Or do you no longer feel the need to be "always working on" a book?
I'm only just now getting my strength back from this book, which was more grueling for me to write than even the Jerry Lewis book, which was more than twice as long. I have about 8 ideas one of which I wrote up and have in a drawer, several of which emerged from this world of Eurotrash and insipid glamour that was Rubi's life, a short book of criticism, even a novel and, perhaps, a series of novels. I keep tossing the dart at the center of the board, but I haven't quite hit it yet. In other words, the readers of THE OREGONIAN aren't safely rid of me yet!
NEXT TIME: Tales of two Natalies!
E-MAIL THE AUTHOR |
ARCHIVES
|