PDA

View Full Version : What Awesome movie had a crappy sequel to it?


GoreFollower
07-17-2003, 01:26 AM
I can think of hundreds, but two real biggies stick out.
"Godfather part 3"
"Crow 2: City of Angels"
What are your thoughts?

"Do we actually have to eat your body and drink your blood?"-Peter: Disciple of Jesus Christ

ELPARKINO
07-17-2003, 01:40 AM
i was kinda disappointed with The Matrix:Reloaded..and Final Destination 2 blew really hard

Denyse
07-17-2003, 01:56 AM
Godfather III was not a sequel. It was part of a trilogy, therefore, the sequel rules do not apply. Your entry will henceforth be disqualified.

My entries:
Analyze That, U.S. Marshalls, "Night of the Day of the Dawn of the Son of the Bride of the Return of the Terror" (no, I'm not kidding, look it up...), Return of the Killer Tomatoes (although Clooney was a riot), Slumber Party Massacre II.

code6enterprises
07-17-2003, 01:57 AM
Speed 2
Tremors 2
James Bond 20:Die Another Day
Star Wars: Episode 1 (not Episode 2, that redeemed itself)
The Skulls 2

I hope that Ferris Beuller 2 doesn't suck or I will have to murder Matthew Broderick.

ratm1966
07-17-2003, 08:35 AM
Wouldn't it be easier to list the movies that had good sequals, as there are less of them?

psychofiend
07-17-2003, 08:41 AM
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
Wouldn't it be easier to list the movies that had good sequals, as there are less of them?

[/ QUOTE ]
Waynes World 2 was awesome.

Monkeyforahead
07-17-2003, 09:45 AM
Matrix

Reloaded was alright, but much less than I anticipated.

code6enterprises
07-17-2003, 03:05 PM
Are you saying that Matrix 2 was good or bad?

Psyche
07-17-2003, 06:03 PM
i think the rule of thumb is any sequal sucks..

ooh my 69th post =x

code6enterprises
07-17-2003, 08:04 PM
Heh Heh 69

ratm1966
07-17-2003, 08:06 PM
69 is fine you know.

TomHarrington
07-17-2003, 08:10 PM
Sit on my face and tell me that you love me.

I'll sit on your face and tell you I love you, too.

I love to hear you oralise

When I'm between your thighs.

You blow me away!



Sit on my face and let my lips embrace you.

I'll sit on your face, and then I'll love you truly.

Life can be fine if we both sixty-nine

If we sit on our faces in all sorts of places and play

Till we're blown away!

35mmCritic
07-17-2003, 08:27 PM
Can you frikin beleive there's a leagally blonde 2?

Psyche
07-17-2003, 08:58 PM
oh yea it felt gewd was it as good for u as it was for me? *grins* *spanks some moviepoopshooters' bums*!

towelie99
07-17-2003, 10:30 PM
In order for The Skulls 2 to be a crappy sequel, The Skulls would have had to been cool, and I'm sorry, it just wasn't. Saw it in the theaters, and I shouldn't have. I'll take your word for it on Skulls 2; haven't seen it. I think it's Paul Walker: not a bad actor, but he has a bad voice, and is given bad lines to say. Except for Varsity Blues; he was good in that.

But what do I know? I have Dude, Where's My Car in my collection! Incidently, they're making a sequel to that, so there's plenty of hope for this thread, yet. (Wonder if Jennifer Garner will be in this one?)

ratm1966
07-17-2003, 10:45 PM
I think I will have to agree with you on Skulls. Hated it. And there is nothing wrong with having "Dude! Wheres My Car?"

towelie99
07-17-2003, 10:49 PM
You're the [censored], ratm1966! /forums/images/icons/cool.gif

ELPARKINO
07-18-2003, 04:47 AM
Cruel Intentions...holy crap...the second one is laughable...hehe....its that really REALLY thin line between BAD horror movie and HIGH quality porn movie. along these lines....Devil in the Flesh with Rose McGowen, anyone seen this?

**DONOTDELETE**
07-18-2003, 05:19 AM
i think that Grease had a sucky sequel 2 it.it made no sence with the first one at all.i luved the first one though but really diliked the second one.

DangerSeeker
07-18-2003, 11:32 AM
My opinions on Grease 2 are a matter of public record at this point.

brycejmcewen
07-18-2003, 11:40 AM
There is a gross mistating of facts in your post.

Paul Walker is in fact, a HORRIBLE actor. I have never seen him do anything good. He was o.k. in "Varsity Blues" but only because he had about 7 lines, and spent most of the movie in the hospital. Had he had a bigger part, he would have sucked.

code6enterprises
07-18-2003, 05:08 PM
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
it.it made no sence with the first one at all.i luved the first one though but really diliked the second one.

[/ QUOTE ]

She actually managed to make that all into one word.

Robbo_the_Hood
07-18-2003, 05:25 PM
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
I have never seen Paul Walker do anything good

[/ QUOTE ]
I really liked Pleasantville. I thought he did a good job for what his character needed. Then I saw him in something else and realized he wasn't acting in Pleasantville.

psychofiend
07-18-2003, 06:50 PM
wait stop right there. you need some dignity, man!!

Omaru
07-18-2003, 08:47 PM
american psycho 2, straight to vid effort. and it sucked so badly.

Infinite_Wizard
07-18-2003, 09:25 PM
Hi there people.........I am a new user so bear with me ok! Cheers

Right then.......What's all this about Paul Walker being a bad actor?

Are you telling me that what he does is ACT?
I've seen cardboard cut-outs with better acting ability than him! Please, I ask you!

code6enterprises
07-18-2003, 10:21 PM
Ok. Props to you for a good and rememberable first post. We'll remember that one when the mps.com awards come around.