karmattack
04-15-2004, 02:00 PM
So, I don't know who else reads Hollywood Elsewhere, but Jeffrey Wells posed an interesting thought in this week's column (or rather broadcast it because the question was sent to him in an email).
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
[imagine] if we lived in an old-fashioned studio system in which the bosses (not the old-fashioned Jewish rug-merchant variety, but enlightened X-factor types like..... well, you choose) could cherry-pick any director working today and assign him or her to direct a film, whether he or she really wants to or not.
No independence, no free agenting....all the competent producers and directors working for the movie factory like blue-collar guys, and if they don't do the movies they're told to do, they're fired.
It's an inflated fantasy, of course (even the big-studio bosses of the 1930s didn't have this much control) but really....wouldn't it be great to call up von Trier on the set of the currently-shooting MANDERLAY in Sweden and tell him, "Okay, you're off this. I know it's late in the game and you're already shooting, but Peter Jackson is taking over. He needs to do something smaller and more character driven. If he stays on the CG big-budget track he'll be burnt out in five years.
"You're on KONG. It starts in August, and none of the DOGVILLE crap with the chalk marks on the floor and the invisible dog."
[/ QUOTE ] So, if given the choice, what would be first on your agenda and why?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
[imagine] if we lived in an old-fashioned studio system in which the bosses (not the old-fashioned Jewish rug-merchant variety, but enlightened X-factor types like..... well, you choose) could cherry-pick any director working today and assign him or her to direct a film, whether he or she really wants to or not.
No independence, no free agenting....all the competent producers and directors working for the movie factory like blue-collar guys, and if they don't do the movies they're told to do, they're fired.
It's an inflated fantasy, of course (even the big-studio bosses of the 1930s didn't have this much control) but really....wouldn't it be great to call up von Trier on the set of the currently-shooting MANDERLAY in Sweden and tell him, "Okay, you're off this. I know it's late in the game and you're already shooting, but Peter Jackson is taking over. He needs to do something smaller and more character driven. If he stays on the CG big-budget track he'll be burnt out in five years.
"You're on KONG. It starts in August, and none of the DOGVILLE crap with the chalk marks on the floor and the invisible dog."
[/ QUOTE ] So, if given the choice, what would be first on your agenda and why?